Last fall, I taught a section of Valparaiso University’s first-year experience course. My course theme was “Re-Thinking Citizenship.” During one session, I asked my students to consider the different communities to which they belong — families, schools, even online — and to write about a specific action they had taken that demonstrated their “citizenship” within that community.
When I read their responses, I was surprised to find that many of them thought of citizenship in terms of random gestures of kindness toward strangers. Many students talked about service projects like showing up at food banks with boxes of canned goods. One described drawing smiley faces on customers’ cups at Starbucks. But few students described actions that contributed to genuine communities built on enduring and reciprocal relationships. They gave, others received. End of story. These responses reflect a common model of “service” that is well-meaning and charitable, but also transactional and simplistic. While this approach may lead to many worthy actions, genuine civic engagement requires more.
It is hardly a surprise that growing up with few compelling examples of citizenship, our students’ understanding of the concept is limited.
In its mission statement, Valparaiso University states an intention to “prepare students to lead and serve in both church and society.” The first step in fostering this kind of civic engagement is to nurture connections between students and communities. We must do so at a time where the students’ own communities are increasingly fractured and fragile due to political, economic, and social polarization. It is hardly a surprise that growing up with few compelling examples of citizenship, our students’ understanding of the concept is limited.
How can we counter this? Community engagement is central to a Valpo education. In the first-year program, students participate in “Field Work” projects that connect them to the broader community and build civic skills. Valpo students commit hundreds of thousands of hours each year to community outreach and service learning. One project that I have been involved with is the Community Research and Service Center (CRSC). In this office, Political Science students conduct research projects for local governments and non-profit organizations. Over thirty years, CRSC students have completed dozens of projects, from surveying community members about their perceptions of local needs to evaluating the effectiveness of after-school programming.
This kind of community-based research teaches students that genuine community engagement depends on building long-term relationships. These projects require sustained collaboration in which research is only the beginning of a process of discerning and responding to community needs. We draw on our partners’ local knowledge and expertise, while they count on us to gather data, analyze it carefully, and communicate findings in ways that are useful to them. This work demands patience, communication, and accountability over time.
One challenge for community-engaged education is that it is resource intensive, demanding significant faculty time and sustained institutional funding. During periods of enrollment decline and financial pressure, these programs become difficult to sustain. At Valpo, this has meant significantly scaling back CRSC operations to reflect this reality. We are exploring partnerships with other campus units and new funding sources to expand our capacity, but that remains a work in progress. Community outreach may be central to our mission, but that does not mean it is easy — or inexpensive — to sustain.
If institutions are to be true to their missions, they must invest in these programs. The CRSC enables students to apply their research skills and intellectual training to benefit communities while learning the discipline of building genuine partnerships. My hope is they come to see their Social Sciences education as the foundation for a life vocation. In these kinds of experiences, our students can begin to transform from well-intentioned individuals into, engaged, and generous citizens of their communities and the world.
-
Editorial
From the Publisher & Editor
Colleen Windham-Hughes, Lamont Anthony Wells
6 min audio
Wells and Windham-Hughes frame vocation as “ground game” — the practical, public living-out of faith through civic engagement — and introduce the issue’s focus on how Lutheran higher education equips students to repair the world.
-
Reflection
I am a Treaty Partner
Kyrie Fairbairn
7 min audio
A recent California Lutheran graduate reflects on how a course on Indigenous Rights and Practices, and a conversation with a former Chairman of the Lummi Nation, led her to claim a “treaty partner” identity and to challenge readers to learn the treaties that shape the lands they call home.
-
Article
Civic Engagement and Faith Perspectives
William O'Brochta
15 min audio
Guest editor William O’Brochta introduces the section by overviewing the ELCA’s call to civic engagement, recapping the Fall 2025 Civic Engagement and Faith Perspectives conference at Texas Lutheran University, and previewing the participant essays that follow.
-
Article
Leaning-In to the Civic Lessons of Our Namesakes
A. Lanethea Mathews-Schultz
6 min audio
Mathews-Schultz uses the civic legacy of the Muhlenberg family — from General Pete’s Revolutionary call to action to President Muhlenberg’s inaugural address on the “education of conscience” — to invite students at Muhlenberg College into a shared civic inheritance.
-
Article
Teaching and Mentoring in Service of Civic Engagement
Haco Hoang
6 min audio
Hoang describes how her teaching, mentoring, and research at California Lutheran University — including a multi-year collaboration with the Lutheran Office of Public Policy on Lutheran Lobby Day — cultivate civic skills grounded in ELCA social statements and the Lutheran tradition of faith and reason.
-
Article
An Ecosystem of Democracy
David Thomason
6 min audio
Thomason argues that faith-based institutions should equip students not to dominate the public sphere with their convictions but to cultivate an “ecosystem of democracy” — pursuing universal values with virtue and tolerance while acknowledging humanity’s incomplete grasp of truth.
-
Article
Bringing Core Values to Life through Civic Engagement
Austin Trantham
5 min audio
Trantham shows how Saint Leo University’s Benedictine Core Values shape his civic engagement work — from advising a “Why Vote?” campaign and Constitution Day panels to engaging students in the Unify Challenge for respectful cross-institutional discourse.
-
Article
Civic Engagement, "Baylor In Deeds," and Engaged Learning
Rebecca Flavin
6 min audio
Flavin describes how Baylor’s strategic plan “Baylor in Deeds” and its Office of Engaged Learning are building civic engagement into the Arts & Sciences core curriculum, with early Global Engagement Survey data showing gains in civic efficacy and global civic responsibility.
-
Article
Fragmented in Faith: The Concerns and Hopes Found in Student Spirituality and Civic Engagement
Emma Bohmann, Monica Sitachitta
11 min audio
Two Texas Lutheran University students reflect on the cyclical pattern of low spiritual and civic engagement on their campus and argue that distinguishing Lutheran values from Lutheran practice could open space for civic engagement to become a non-optional expression of neighbor-justice for all students.
-
Reflection
Be Like Jesus: Flip Some Tables
Jessica Easter
No. 57 · Spring 2023
Easter argues that the example of Jesus overturning the moneychangers’ tables in Matthew 21 calls Christians not to work within unjust systems but to disrupt them — and that this table-flipping must be done in community with others who share the vision of a world where all are seen, heard, and valued.
-
Response
Response to Mark Wilhelm: DEI, Great; DWS (Dismantling White Supremacy), Even Better
Vic Thasiah
No. 56 · Fall 2022
Thasiah argues that if Lutheran colleges and universities want to live out their commitment to the flourishing of all, DEI is good but DWS — dismantling white supremacy — is even better, and offers three Lutheran sensibilities (suspicion of self-righteousness, the decolonial shockwave of the cross, and critical thinking that can still register awe) that can make DWS a core practice of higher education.
-
Response
"Whose Future?" or "Social Justice and the Lutheran Academy?"
Marsha Heck
No. 1 · Summer 1996
Heck argues that the future of Lutheran higher education lies less in defining Lutheran distinctiveness than in moral action grounded in face-to-face relationships with others. Drawing on David Lotz’s two-kingdoms theology of citizenship, Ernest Simmons’s relational reading of Luther, Arthur Preisinger’s indictment of the German Lutheran misreading of two kingdoms during the Third Reich, Starla Stensaas of Dana College, and Paulo Freire’s dialectic of empowerment, she calls Lutheran colleges to integrate moral reflection with moral action—to move students’ muscles against what is not true as well as to feel truths in their bones.
-
Editorial
Guest Editor
Madeleine Forell Marshall
No. 25 · Spring 2007
Marshall introduces the four papers in this issue from the 70th annual meeting of the Association of Lutheran College Faculties, held at California Lutheran University in October 2006 on the theme “Identity and Diversity in the Lutheran College.” She notes a geographic pattern—the two East Coast contributors (Balmer and Bailey) defend Christian liberal arts against perceived suspicion, while the two Westerners (Marichal and Brubaker) treat Lutheran identity as advantage and diversity as a Lutheran given—and announces the 2007 ALCF meeting at Newberry College on “Beyond ‘Whatever’: Values Based Learning in Lutheran Higher Education.”
-
Article
The Vocation of White People in a Racist Society
Caryn Riswold
No. 50 · Fall 2019
Riswold proposes that whiteness is a weakness borne of apathy, atrophy, and ignorance — an atrophied muscle of race-consciousness — and offers concrete practices (reading, adjusting one’s gaze, consuming media differently, drawing on ELCA social statements like the repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery) for exercising that muscle and naming the vocation of white people in a racist and white supremacist culture.
-
Article
Impelled to Pluralism: Thoughts About Teaching in a Lutheran University
Jim Huffman
No. 17 · Summer 2003
Huffman traces his personal journey through three stages of faith—the “comfortable Christ” of his Midwestern Christian childhood, Clark Pinnock’s “faith principle” of accessible salvation, and finally Christ as the “humble teacher”—to a pluralism that rejects religious triumphalism without abandoning Christian commitment. Drawing on Diana Eck, Wesley Ariarajah, John Cobb, the Catholic novelist Endo Shusaku, and the histories of Confucian China and imperial Japan, he then describes how this commitment shapes his teaching of East Asian religion and nationalism at Wittenberg University: insisting on respectful language, working sympathetically through doctrines like Buddhist non-attachment, and helping students see the pernicious effects of triumphalism in both religious and political life.