Affirming, Entrusting, and Acting: A Baptismal Grounding of Affirmative Action in Lutheran Higher Education
Intersections No. 60 · Fall 2024
“How do you define affirmative action in the context of Lutheran (NECU) higher education, and what are its main objectives?”
This provocative question was asked to those of us who attended this past summer’s Vocation of Lutheran Higher Education Conference at Augsburg University after a panel discussion on our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion at institutions of the Network of ELCA Colleges and Universities (NECU).
We were asked to respond to this question while gathered in small groups with colleagues who occupy similar positions at other NECU institutions.
When this question came up on the screen, it immediately stimulated my imagination.
I thought perhaps, as the whitest Christian denomination in North America, institutions of the ELCA had little to say about the practice of affirmative action in our society.
As institutions grounded by the vision presented in “Rooted and Open: The Common Calling of the Network of ELCA Colleges and Universities,” I began to imagine how it was that Lutheran theology and practice might support and affirm the ways our institutions strive to create spaces for all students, particularly for those who come from under-represented populations on our campuses.
To this end, I asked myself, “Where in the shared practice of Lutheran communities do we make affirmations and where do we take action?”
As a Lutheran pastor, I immediately thought of the sacrament of baptism because it is through baptism that individuals are welcomed and incorporated into the community of the church.
Baptism is a sign of radical welcome into a community, where the baptized now unconditionally belong.
To do this, the Lutheran baptism liturgy includes a moment where the pastor presiding over the baptism asks the entire gathered assembly to make a profession of their faith.
“Where in the shared practice of Lutheran communities do we make affirmations and where do we take action?”
In this profession of faith, the pastor asks the assembly a series of six questions. The first three ask the gathered assembly to renounce ways of the world that defy God’s desire for humanity and creation, including evil and sin. The second three ask the assembly what they believe, using the words of the Apostles’s Creed to affirm faith.
The assembly is ritually asked what they say “no” to and what they say “yes” to. In their responses, they make affirmative statements about the content of their belief.1
Earlier in the liturgy, the presiding minister lists the responsibilities that are entrusted to those who are baptized, concluding with the effect these responsibilities have on the baptized, namely “so that [they] may learn to trust God, proclaim Christ through word and deed, care for others and the world God made, and work for justice and peace.”2
In the sacrament, the act of affirming belief entrusts the baptized with responsibilities, through which they are called to action in the world.
Action that promotes care, justice, and peace in our world.
As all these thoughts swirled in my head, I shared some of these initial ideas with colleagues at the conference. Speaking together, they helped me articulate a connection between my thinking and our shared work. Because similar to the way the gathered assembly affirms what they are for in the baptismal liturgy, our colleges and universities are also called to affirm what it is that we are for.
“Because similar to the way the gathered assembly affirms what they are for in the baptismal liturgy, our colleges and universities are also called to affirm what it is that we are for.”
In “Rooted and Open,” the authors affirm that “In their appreciation and cultivation of diversity in its many forms, Lutheran colleges and universities welcome all and learn from all.”3
This is an affirmation echoed by many of our schools in mission statements and college or university values. At my own school, St. Olaf College, our mission statement specifically names that we strive for our students to learn in an “inclusive, globally engaged community.”4
In this mission, we make an affirmative statement about the community of which we are a part.
“As the sacrament of baptism reminds us, our affirmations also entrust us with responsibilities, which move us towards action in our communities and the world.”
But, as the sacrament of baptism reminds us, our affirmations also entrust us with responsibilities, which move us towards action in our communities and the world.
The questions for our communities, then, are: What responsibilities do our affirmations to create diverse, inclusive communities create for us? And what actions do our responsibilities call us towards?
A Lutheran perspective on affirmative action argues that we will create truly inclusive and just communities when we clearly affirm our commitments, name the responsibilities that our affirmation entrusts to us, and act in ways that embody our affirmations.
May our work be grounded in such affirmations, responsibilities, and actions that we continue to move our communities to be places of belonging so that all our students may flourish.
Endnotes
1. “Holy Baptism,” in Evangelical Lutheran Worship (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 2006), 229.
2. Ibid, 228
3. “Rooted and Open,” May 18, 2018, https://elcamediaresources.blob.core.windows.net/cdn/wp-content/uploads/Rooted_and_Open.pdf.
4. “Mission,” About St. Olaf, June 7, 2023, https://wp.stolaf.edu/about/mission/.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Colleen Windham-Hughes
Windham-Hughes welcomes newcomers and seasoned colleagues to the conversation, lifts up Mary Elise Lowe’s three Lutheran “whys” for educational access, and commends Rev. Jen Rude’s “Sacred Pause” practice as a way to humanize one another and make opening access both easier and more joyful.
-
Editorial
From the Publisher: Reflections on the 2024 Vocational Leaders in Higher Education Conference
Lamont Anthony Wells
Wells reflects on the 2024 VLHE Conference theme — “Educational Access: Lutheran Roots, Contemporary Practices” — tracing today’s commitment to inclusivity back to Martin Luther’s radical 16th-century insistence that both boys and girls be educated, and previews NECU’s expanded engagement of student leaders alongside faculty and administrators.
-
Article
Access, Accessibility, & Change: A Call for Trustworthy Leadership in Higher Education
Emma Jones
Jones surveys the converging pressures on higher education — cost, the enrollment cliff, shifting demographics, and declining public confidence — and uses Reichheld and Dunlap’s four factors of trust (transparency, capability, reliability, humanity) to call campus leaders to rebuild trustworthy leadership from the inside out.
-
Article
Creation, Justice, and Communio: Lutheran Insights Empowering Educational Access
Mary Elise Lowe
In her VLHE keynote, Lowe names three Lutheran commitments — continuing creation, neighbor justice, and communio — as the “why” that empowers ELCA colleges and universities to pursue equitable access for students often left behind by persistence and graduation gaps.
-
Article
Committed to Paradox
Caryn Riswold
Riswold lifts up paradox — saint and sinner, lord and servant, Rooted and Open — as a distinctive Lutheran root that lets institutions honor the complicated truth of who their students are and embrace the messy, ever-reforming work of access and accessibility as a theology of the cross.
-
Article
2024 VHLE Conference: "Rooting Access" Panel Talking Points
Guy Nave
Nave reads “access” across Deuteronomy 23, Ruth, Isaiah 56, Acts 10, and Matthew 15:21-28 as an ongoing biblical conversation that evolves from exclusion to ever-widening welcome — and presses ELCA institutions to shift their focus from “student readiness” to “institutional readiness.”
-
Reflection
Reflecting on Belonging
Melissa Woeppel
Woeppel, campus pastor at her own alma mater, wrestles with a Bethany student’s plea — “I want to feel like this is my home, like I belong” — and Mindy Makant’s reminder that we don’t choose the story of the past but do choose how we tell it forward, opening space for students from 35 faith traditions to find Lutheran institutions to be their home.
-
Article
Leading Students to Distinguish Between Career and Vocation: Reflections from a Lutheran Law School
Steven C. Bahls
No. 20 · Fall 2004
Bahls, writing as former dean of the Capital University Law School, argues that most law students and many legal educators confuse vocation with career—asking “what kind of lawyer do you want to be?” rather than “who do I want to be?” Drawing on John O. Mudd’s five attributes of a well-prepared lawyer and Susan Daicoff’s empirical research on lawyer dissatisfaction and the “amoral professional role,” he turns to Ernest L. Simmons’s and Darrel Jodock’s articulations of Luther’s understanding of vocation and proposes five steps—reflection, assessment, vision, integrative thinking, and reassessment—along with explicit leadership from law school deans, engagement of career services offices, and leadership within the profession (illustrated by Capital’s joint venture with the Columbus Bar Association).
-
Article
Academic Vocation: What the Lutheran University has to Offer
Wendy McCredie
No. 19 · Summer 2004
Writing as a practicing Lutheran, a trained literary scholar, and the associate director for interpretation at the ELCA churchwide office, McCredie articulates a vocation for ELCA colleges and universities grounded in the dialogical tension Gilbert Meilaender names between “bonds of particular love” and “a love which is open to every neighbor.” Drawing on Berube and Nelson, Marsden, Pelikan, Schwehn, Toulmin, Simmons, Hughes, MacIntyre, and Wolterstorff, she argues that Lutheran tradition resists both the easy separation and the collapse of sacred and secular, that human reason errs while God’s grace makes action possible, and that listening to the marginalized and to those outside the tradition is itself a theology of the cross enacted in classroom and collegial life.
-
Article
Who Said You Have Only One Calling?
Peter Marty
No. 27 · Spring 2008
Marty argues that our normal practice of thinking singularly about vocation must be enlarged: God has not limited any of us to one expression or gift, and Martin Luther never spoke of individuals as having only one calling. Drawing on Max DePree’s parable of the millwright-poet, William May on the etymology of “career,” Evelyn Underhill on the verb “to Be,” James VanOosting, Scot McKnight’s “Jesus Creed,” and a Golden Gate Bridge patrolman who has saved hundreds of lives, he identifies four features common to every story of vocation in scripture: special purpose, special gifts, a caller from outside, and the requirement of sacrifice and generosity.
-
Reflection
A Community That Connects
Conrad Bergendoff
No. 5 · Summer 1998
Excerpts from Conrad Bergendoff’s 1990 address at the opening of Augustana’s new library, prepared by David Crowe and published here as a memorial after Bergendoff’s death in December 1997. Bergendoff—Augustana class of 1915, president 1936–1962—recounts eighty years of Augustana memories, insists that “size is pretty much within you, not outside of you,” traces the institution’s bonds to Uppsala from 1860 (and the 1910 visit of the Rector Magnificat), and celebrates Augustana’s graduates “in practically every part of the world” as evidence that a small school can have a universal output.
-
Article
Diversity, Integrity, and Lutheran Colleges
Florence D. Amamoto
No. 8 · Winter 2000
Amamoto—a sansei Jodo Shin Shu Buddhist who is “an inside outsider” at Gustavus Adolphus—argues that diversity and integrity belong together in Lutheran higher education, perhaps in a way unmatched by other church-related traditions. She affirms the importance of Gustavus’s 60% Lutheran student body and vibrant Christ Chapel under Richard Elvee and Brian Johnson while warning that numbers and chapel are not enough, draws on Tom Christenson, Patricia Gurin, Sylvia Hurtado, Anthony Carnevale, Martha Nussbaum, W. E. B. DuBois (the deaths of Matthew Shepard and Isaiah Shoels), Richard Hughes’s reading of finitum capax infiniti, Richard Solberg, and Mark Schwehn’s mutual hospitality model, and concludes that the real enemy is not diversity but indifference—and that Lutheran finitude grounds a theological commitment to keeping diversity and identity in creative conversation.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Jason A. Mahn
No. 45 · Spring 2017
Mahn introduces “Education in the Age of Trump” by recounting a difficult academic year on his own campus — the Augustana “chalking” incident, a Latinx Unidos rally, and post-election conversations with marginalized students and quietly conservative Trump supporters alike — and frames the issue’s essays as careful (re)imaginings of the vocation of Lutheran higher education in an anxious political climate.