Richard T. Hughes: How Christian Faith Can Sustain the Life of the Mind
Intersections No. 13 · Winter 2002
Richard T. Hughes, How Christian Faith Can Sustain the Life of the Mind. Eerdmans Publishing, Grand Rapids, MI; 2001.
Richard Hughes’ book addresses a number of vital and engaging questions, questions about pedagogy, about the difference between preaching and teaching, about the place of tragedy and death in the learning/teaching context, etc. But the main thrust of the book is to argue that the Christian faith is not only compatible with an open pursuit of the truth, but that faith is a means to such a pursuit, that faith can sustain the life of the mind. Hughes begins, I think rightly, by addressing what he calls a “stereotypical assumption” about faith; that it is dogmatic, close-minded and inclined to thinking of teaching as indoctrination. I think Hughes would have done well to talk more about the sources of this stereotype and why, in spite of many of our best efforts, it is so common. I frequently hear people talk about our Lutheran institutions saying things like this: “They are faith-based, but surprisingly open to diverse points of view.” “They require religion courses, but don’t try to convert you to a particular religious point of view.” “They have chapel, but don’t require attendance, and they actually encourage people to practice their own religions even when they are not Christians.” The unspoken text of all such comments is “Contrary to normal expectation here are religious people and institutions that are open-minded, questioning, and who create an open, non-coercive space for learning. Certainly they can’t be very serious about their faith claims!”
Hughes locates this requisite openness in what, quoting Tillich, he identifies as “religion breaking through its own particularity.” Using as example, the Bible, Hughes explains:
The Bible points us not to itself, but rather to the infinite God whose understanding no human being can fathom and who stands in judgement on all our claims that somehow we have captured ultimate truth. …. Can the Bible, viewed in these terms, sustain the life of the mind? It can indeed, for if the Bible points beyond itself to the infinite God, we have no choice but to search for truth. …when we view ourselves in relation to God, we understand how abysmally ignorant we really are. [34-35]
For Lutherans, of course, this should not be a new argument. How else, we might ask, should a tradition grounded in reformation, i.e. in an act of faithful criticism, be related to the truth? How else should the call “semper reformanda” be understood if not as the claim that all our forms and formulations are in need of continual critique and rethinking? Yet Lutherans have been dogmatic and close-minded. Luther himself, at the same time that he plead for an open hearing and debate of his views, condemned most unsympathetically the views of many of his contemporaries including fellow reformers. So this temptation, to argue from the absoluteness of God to the absoluteness of our own view of God, is not just something that has beset others.
Hughes raises the issue whether openness and a commitment to hearing a diversity of voices doesn’t lead to relativism. He asserts that it does not, that we needn’t end up accepting every view on the grounds of universal toleration, but he does not map out that border territory very clearly. Perhaps another chapter was needed, one in which he could explain or model the difference between a commitment to an absolute truth that transcends (and relativizes?) all human truths, and a post-modern abandonment of the idea of truth altogether. Even better, it would be interesting to have seen what the difference would be between the community of discourse in two institutions focused on these differing paradigms. My guess is that most Lutheran institutions currently find themselves navigating that border, and not the border between affirmation and dogmatism, that may be more focal in other traditions.
While Hughes does not just address institutions like ours, he does raise issues which we need to be talking about. At the November meeting of academic officers of North American Lutheran colleges and universities, Hughes’ book was the one most frequently cited. So we know that such conversation has already begun, and we hope that it will continue and be broadened.
-
Editorial
From the Publisher
Arne Selbyg
Selbyg reports that Executive Director Leonard Schulze has challenged the ELCA Division for Higher Education and Schools to develop a comprehensive communications plan reaching high school students, college students, parents, pastors, and journalists, and invites Intersections readers to review the redesigned elcacolleges.org website, the “FREE STUFF” brochures, the journal’s advertisements in The Lutheran and related publications, Ernie Simmons’ new Augsburg-Fortress book Lutheran Higher Education: An Introduction, and the ELCA video magazine Mosaic—and to send in their own ideas.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Tom Christenson
Christenson previews a varied issue—Darrell Jodock’s Bernhardson inaugural lecture, Ernie Simmons’ Valparaiso conference talk on student/parent attitudes, two South Africa travel pieces by Brian Wallace and Corin Wesner, and reviews of Richard Hughes’s and Robert Benne’s recent books—and tells the story of “the church lady from hell,” a mid-fifties returning student who condemned everyone in the class with “God and I think…,” to ask what a religious tradition without a sense of humor would look like.
-
Article
The Lutheran Theological Tradition and Recruiting Lutheran Students
Ernest L. Simmons
Simmons opens with an Abraham-and-Isaac “Windows 98” joke to illustrate the dialectic of faith and learning, then argues that in a new market era of limited religious background, intentional mission and marketing go together. Drawing on Levine and Cureton’s When Hope and Fear Collide for the Millennial Generation born in 1982 and Tom Beaudoin’s Virtual Faith for their GenX parents, he reads “Reclaiming Lutheran Students” survey results showing 86% strong community at ELCA colleges versus 54% at flagship publics and 61% alumni mentoring versus 39%. He then develops three areas where the Lutheran tradition uniquely equips its colleges—community, mentoring and vocation, and the integration of faith and values—using Luther’s “two kingdoms” image of the “Left Hand” (reason) and “Right Hand” (faith) of God, with academic freedom as a product of Ahlstrom’s “Critical Current” in the tradition, and closes with three challenges: recruiting and retaining mentoring faculty, educating church leaders, and reaching potential students and parents.
-
Article
Freedom, Humor, and Community: A Lutheran Vision for Higher Education
Darrell Jodock
Jodock’s inaugural lecture for the Bernhardson chair at Gustavus Adolphus develops three interlocking themes drawn from the Lutheran tradition as a deeper grounding for the liberal arts college than contemporary American assumptions. A sense of humor rests on Luther’s discovery that God takes the initiative—Luther could call himself a beggar, joke about the epistle of James, and credit Wittenberg beer for the Reformation—and underwrites the freedom of inquiry that John Updike traces to Grace Lutheran Sunday School in Shillington. Community, grounded in Augsburg Confession VII and Luther’s 1524 letter to the German city councils, makes the college a community of discourse pursuing wisdom rather than “the same old blockheads.” Freedom is both “freedom from” and “freedom for,” illustrated by Nechama Tec’s Polish Holocaust rescuers and by Jodock’s Holocaust-class corporate role-play in which students voted to build a factory in a death camp rather than risk losing their board seats—a vivid case for educating toward “a passion for justice.”
-
Reflection
Truth, Reconciliation, and Redemption in South Africa
Brian Forry Wallace
Wallace, a 24-year veteran political science professor at Capital University, recounts five weeks of post-apartheid peace-building travel-study with students living south of Cape Town—visiting townships, schools, day-care centers, a children’s AIDS hospital, Robben Island, and Nelson Mandela’s cell—and offers vivid sketches of his student companions Amy, Brian, Meghan, Karrie, Patrick, Meredith, Cheryl, Corin, Debbie, April, and Audra. He concludes that these students—atheists and agnostics and Buddhists and Methodists and Baptists, headed for social work, nursing, teaching, ministry, and parenthood—embody vocation by responding to a voice that calls them out of themselves to be present and to heal in this world, and that they are his link to the redemption of a lost and broken soul.
-
Reflection
Sweet on My Lips
Corin Wesner
A passage from Wesner’s travel journal during the same South Africa workshop. Walking into a wood-and-tin shack church where raindrops fall on already-soaked carpet and the service is in Xhosa, she remembers her painted, carpeted home church and her adolescent argument with her mother about wearing a dress to worship, and finds herself engulfed in warmth as the few women sing—welcomed by a stranger’s smile and opened up.
-
Book Review
Robert Benne: Quality With Soul: How Six Premier Colleges and Universities Keep Faith With Their Religious Traditions
Joy Schroeder
Schroeder reviews Robert Benne’s Quality With Soul (Eerdmans, 2001), which assesses the secularization documented by James T. Burtchaell’s The Dying of the Light and names six “bright lights” that resist it: Calvin, Wheaton, Baylor, Notre Dame, Valparaiso, and St. Olaf. Benne argues that piety alone or “generic Christianity” is insufficient—a school’s specific denominational intellectual tradition must permeate mission statements, classroom, and chapel, sustained by a critical mass of identifying faculty (he proposes a 2:1 ratio and at least one-third communicant membership), a first-rate theology department as “trustworthy guardian,” and visionary presidential and board leadership. Schroeder flags the under-representation of student and faculty voices but commends the book as required reading for presidents, board members, and faculty seminars at church-related institutions.
-
Article
The Vocation of Intersections on its Twentieth Birthday
Jason A. Mahn, Robert D. Haak, Tom Christenson
No. 43 · Spring 2016
The three editors of Intersections — Bob Haak, Jason Mahn, and Tom Christenson (in spirit, following his death in 2013) — trace the twenty-year vocation of the journal itself: its 1996 birth at Capital University; its coming-of-age years of debate over institutional markers, two-kingdoms theology, and Lutheran identity; the ascendancy of “education for vocation” as the central marker of Lutheran higher education; and its ongoing identity in relation to a changing ELCA and to the broader cultural conversation about purpose, wholeness, and the vocation of higher education.
-
Article
Point / Counterpoint: What It Means to be a "College of the Church"
Robert Benne, Tom Christenson
No. 28 · Fall 2008
Moderated by Wartburg College pastor Larry Trachte and introduced by Kathryn Kleinhans, this Wartburg campus conversation between Robert Benne (Roanoke College) and Thomas Christenson (Capital University) probes what it means to be a college of the church—Benne emphasizing ethos, vocation, and the Christian intellectual tradition over against secularization and generic education, and Christenson lifting up persistent vocational questions, the gift of difference, and induction into a community of discourse—and finds large common ground around hiring for mission, pedagogy that asks deep questions, and the courage to claim a living religious tradition while inviting everyone to the banquet.
-
Article
Education as a Christian (Lutheran) Calling
Tom Christenson
No. 21 · Summer 2005
Christenson opens with an imaginative reconstruction of early Christian communities as radically egalitarian, pacifist, communitarian gatherings within the Roman Empire and argues that such communities are natural homes for the educational vocation. Naming two temptations for contemporary Christian higher education—the parochial Bible school and “Generic U”—he uses his friend Sig Rauspern’s tree metaphor to insist that a university is Christian in its trunk and roots rather than in grafted-on branches. Drawing on Wendell Berry, Jacob Bronowski, Walter Wink, Douglas John Hall, and his own Gift and Task of Lutheran Higher Education, he names faithful criticism, engaged suspiciousness, simul justus et peccator, and a fallible, love-related Lutheran epistemology as the particular gifts Lutherans bring to the Christian educational calling.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Tom Christenson
No. 21 · Summer 2005
In his valedictory letter as outgoing editor, Christenson recounts the 1994 origins of Intersections, when he took the idea to Naomi Linnell and Jim Unglaube at DHES and persuaded the council of presidents to launch the journal on a shoestring with printing paid by DHES and everything else by Capital University. He summarizes the issue’s contents—papers from the 2004 Vocation of a Lutheran College Conference plus two commissioned pieces from former DHES directors Bob Sorensen and Leonard Schulze—and thanks the student copy editors and Capital’s presidents and provosts who sustained the publication.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Tom Christenson
No. 20 · Fall 2004
Christenson introduces an issue featuring “young and old, angry and encouraging, prophetic and hopeful” voices unified by the assumption that Christians engaged in thinking and educating will ask hard questions: how to raise concerns about militarism and the new American “imperialism,” what a Lutheran law school will say about training a new generation of attorneys, and what Lutheran colleges communicate to undergrads about vocation. Such faithful criticism, he argues, is part of who Lutheran institutions are.
-
Book Review
Review of Educating for Shalom: Essays on Christian Higher Education
Tom Christenson
No. 20 · Fall 2004
Christenson reviews Nicholas Wolterstorff’s Educating for Shalom: Essays on Christian Higher Education (Eerdmans, 2004), edited by C.W. Joldersma and G.G. Stronks. After recounting his own early prejudice against Wolterstorff’s Reason Within the Bounds of Religion and his subsequent conversion through Art in Action, he focuses on two threads: Wolterstorff’s expansive reading of shalom—not merely peace but justice, community, communal responsibility, and delight—as the overall goal of Christian collegiate education, and the influence of Abraham Kuyper’s claim of “privileged cognitive access” for Christian inquirers, which Wolterstorff demonstrates rather than declares.
-
Response
Response to Robert Benne
Baird Tipson
No. 17 · Summer 2003
Tipson responds to Robert Benne’s comments in the previous issue about his review essay of The Future of Religious Colleges, affirming their fundamental agreement that the Enlightenment epistemology dominant in higher education poses the most serious threat to the vitality of Lutheran colleges. Using the example of lecturing on early Mormon history and the Book of Mormon, he concedes that the methodological “solvent” of Enlightenment historiography acts on Christian as well as Mormon faith claims, and concludes that while H. Richard Niebuhr’s “inner” and “outer” history and Walter Brueggemann’s approach in The Theology of the Old Testament are comforting to believers, they do not offer an epistemology that can stand alongside the Enlightenment model in evaluating truth claims in the academy.
-
Article
Vocational Leadership
Darrell Jodock
No. 41 · Spring 2015
Jodock proposes “vocational leadership” as a name for a distinctive educational value at the heart of a Lutheran college — one that seeks to benefit the neighbor and the community, inspires and invites others to participate in that service, and is institutionally anchored in the Lutheran concept of vocation. He unpacks twelve facets of vocational leadership and ties them to Luther’s own leadership around indulgences, public schooling, and beggary.
-
Response
“You Shall Know the Truth, and the Truth Will Set You Free”: A Scientist’s Response
Ben Huddle
No. 2 · Winter 1997
Huddle of Roanoke College proposes adding a sixth theme to Bouman’s five—the scientific method—as a tool for knowing the Truth not available to Luther but central to twentieth- and twenty-first-century learning. Diagramming the continuous cycle of observations, laws, theories, and predictions, he argues that scientists must be ethical and that scholars in other fields must understand the scientific method (lest environmentalists ignore the Second Law of Thermodynamics). A Lutheran college, he concludes, should treasure both the religious and the scientific tradition: stifling either loses meaning or significance, and the Lutheran tradition is therefore biblical, catholic, evangelical, sacramental, scientific, and world-affirming.
-
Article
Reconciled Diversity: Reflections on our Calling to Embrace our Religious Neighbors
Jacqueline Bussie
No. 33 · Spring 2011
Bussie offers three concrete recommendations for cultivating reconciled religious diversity on Lutheran campuses — Lutheran listening and the telling of stories, engendering encounters with religious neighbors through curriculum and bridge-building events, and choosing empathy and collaboration over evangelism and creed — arguing that what students fear most in encounters with the religious “other” is the loss of their own identity and distinctiveness, and that we can show them how loyalty to one’s own tradition and reverence for different traditions can coexist.
-
Article
The Divide Within (Not Between) Liberal Arts and Professional Education
Lake Lambert
No. 24 · Fall 2006
Lambert, then Board of Regents Chair in Ethics at Wartburg College and Project Director for the “Discovering and Claiming our Callings Initiative,” argues that the real divide in higher education runs not between the liberal arts and the professions but within each — between teaching that forms students for callings and teaching that merely transmits content or credential. He calls Lutheran colleges to recover, across both liberal arts and professional disciplines, a shared commitment to vocational formation grounded in the Lutheran tradition.
-
Editorial
From the Editor
Robert D. Haak
No. 29 · Spring 2009
Haak frames the issue’s essays around the question of Lutheran colleges and the role of citizen, noting H. Richard Niebuhr’s typology in Christ and Culture and Luther’s own complex understanding of Christian and state, and offers a fitting farewell to Arne Selbyg with Mike Blair’s tribute song “A Fine Norwegian.”